By · ·

Motorcycle comparison · Supersport

Yamaha YZF-R1 (RN22) vs Honda CBR1000RR (SC59)

Yamaha YZF-R1 vs Honda CBR1000RR: which one to buy for the riding you do.

Winding out of a fast bend on stock rubber, the Yamaha YZF-R1 doesn't hide what its rear tire's doing from your right hand. On that same grip the Honda CBR1000RR hauls out of the exit with its frame and steering damper holding the front quiet. Its bars don't twitch as the speed piles on.

Yamaha YZF-R1 (RN22) and Honda CBR1000RR (SC59) side by side
Yamaha YZF-R1 (RN22) 2009–2014 · The Crossplane Traction Machine Honda CBR1000RR (SC59) 2008–2011 · Lightweight Precision At Its Sharpest

So which one do you buy?

The YZF-R1 has the edge if…

Racetrack use

A touch ahead: YZF-R1

On a closed course, the YZF-R1 edges ahead. What tips it: stronger brakes. Not by enough to settle it.

The CBR1000RR has the edge if…

Daily commuting & city riding

Narrow edge: CBR1000RR

The CBR1000RR makes slightly more sense as a commuter. Most of that is lighter steering. Don't read much into a gap this small.

Sporty riding on twisty roads

Slight edge: CBR1000RR

Back-road fun leans slightly toward the CBR1000RR. That comes from a sportier chassis and more feel through the bars. It's a narrow call, so trust your test ride.

Which one's the smarter buy

Even on value

At these used prices, neither bike is the clear better buy for the money.

What makes each one tick

YZF-R1

Into a slow corner, a string of hard downshifts doesn't unsettle the YZF-R1's tail as it steers in. Blow the entry and the bike lets you fix it on the arc without a fight. Through a tight chicane it's slower to switch sides, and each change of direction takes an extra beat. At track pace, the soft suspension wallows. Its crossplane four puts traction ahead of headline numbers.

Nils rode the YZF-R1 in Australia in 2009, in 2010, in Spain in 2011, and in Portugal in 2012 (1000PS test reports).

CBR1000RR

Light on its wheels, the CBR1000RR flicks into a turn like a far smaller sportbike. There's clear feedback through the fork and shock when a bump comes up. The chassis stays rock-solid. Up top, the four's rush keeps building to redline.

The Voice of Experience

Portrait of NastyNils

What actually separates them

  • The CBR1000RR has the lower seat: 32.3 in (820 mm) vs 32.9 in (835 mm).
  • The CBR1000RR has the lower wet weight: 439 lb (199 kg) vs 454 lb (206 kg).
  • ABS: option (from 2009) on the CBR1000RR, not offered on the YZF-R1.

See every difference ↓

Which one for the way you ride

Comfortable long-distance riding

Look elsewhere

Hours in the saddle won't flatter either of these. They're happier on shorter runs.

There's no real gap on running costs. Sit on both and let fit and price decide.

Who each one is built for

US Trackday & Apex Hunter

Barber Motorsports Park · WeatherTech Raceway Laguna Seca · Circuit of the Americas

SoCal Canyon Performance Rider

Angeles Crest Highway · Coronado Trail · Highway 1

Appalachian Technical Corner Rider

Back of the Dragon · Blue Ridge Parkway · Cherohala Skyway

What's good, and what you'll live with

YZF-R1

From Nils' own saddle time

Strengths

  • Crossplane Voice, No Equal
  • Forgiving, Planted Chassis
  • Rear-Wheel Feel You Can Trust
  • Crisp, Willing Gearbox

Trade-offs

  • Top-End Trails The Class
  • Suspension Too Soft For Track
  • No ABS On Offer
  • Heavy, Slow In Transitions

CBR1000RR

What owners say

Strengths

  • Exceptionally balanced and stable chassis
  • Lightweight, 600-like agility
  • Renowned Honda build quality and reliability
  • Smooth, top-end-focused engine

Known problems to check before you buy

YZF-R1

  • Regulator/rectifier failure The factory regulator/rectifier is known to overheat and fail, leading to either a flat battery or, in worse cases, fried wiring at the connector.
  • Cam chain tensioner wear and rattle Original spring-loaded cam chain tensioners can lose tension, causing a top-end rattle at idle and on overrun. The aftermarket APE manual tensioner is a popular fix.
  • Stator failure The charging stator can fail prematurely, sometimes related to or causing R/R failure; symptoms include erratic voltage and progressive electrical issues.
  • Fuel pump failure Some owners report fuel pump degradation leading to power loss at higher rpm or stalling; usually requires pump replacement.
  • Snatchy fuelling at low rpm in STD/A mode Abrupt throttle response just off closed makes smooth low-speed riding difficult; many owners default to the softer B-map for town use.

CBR1000RR

  • Fuel pump impeller stalling (safety recall) Recall 24V864000 A manufacturing defect in the fuel pump can cause the rubber impeller to swell and lock, cutting off fuel flow and causing the engine to stall without warning. Honda issued a safety recall for affected 2008–2016 CBR1000RR models to inspect and replace the fuel pump assembly.

What they cost used

Both bikes priced used at the same age: 15 years old.

YZF-R1
about $7,700
CBR1000RR
about $7,600

What they share

Engine
Inline-four
Cooling
Liquid-cooled
Gearbox
6-speed
Final drive
Chain
Fork
Upside-down (USD)
Front tire
120/70-17

Where the spec sheets split

Seat height and weight
YZF-R1 CBR1000RR
Seat height 32.9 in (835 mm) 32.3 in (820 mm)
Wet weight 454 lb (206 kg) 439 lb (199 kg)
Engine, power and torque
YZF-R1 CBR1000RR
Displacement 998 cc 999 cc
Power 182 hp (134 kW) 178 hp (131 kW)
Peak power at 12,500 rpm 12,000 rpm
Torque 85 lb-ft (116 Nm) 83 lb-ft (112 Nm)
Peak torque at 10,000 rpm 8,500 rpm
Fuel economy and tank capacity
YZF-R1 CBR1000RR
Fuel economy 33 mpg (US) / 7.2 L/100 km 30 mpg (US) / 7.85 L/100 km
Fuel capacity 4.8 US gal (18 L) 4.7 US gal (17.7 L)
Other specifications
YZF-R1 CBR1000RR
Front brake 310 mm 320 mm
Rear tire 190/55-17 190/50-17
Wheelbase 55.7 in (1415 mm) 55.4 in (1407 mm)

What comes fitted, what costs extra

YZF-R1 CBR1000RR
ABS Not offered Option (from 2009)
Traction Control Standard (from 2012) Not offered
Ride Modes Standard Not offered

Head to head, area by area

Both bikes on the same scale, one area at a time.

Braking

Engine

Handling

Suspension

Comfort

Reliability

Practicality

Sporting Capability

Usability

Specs and equipment as of October 17, 2026. The riding calls use the same ratings behind both buyer's guides.