By ·

Motorcycle comparison · Naked Bike

Kawasaki Z 750R (Z750R-MY2011) vs Z 800 (ZR A)

Kawasaki Z 750R vs Z 800: no fairing, no excuses. Here's how to pick.

You'll place the Kawasaki Z 750R in a corner and it goes exactly where you put it, without a wrestle. The Kawasaki Z 800 makes you feel its heft as you flick it from one side to the other. Once it's leaned over, it hides that mass well.

Kawasaki Z 750R (Z750R-MY2011) and Kawasaki Z 800 (ZR A) side by side
Kawasaki Z 750R (Z750R-MY2011) 2011–2013 · Reliable Middleweight, Honest Fun Kawasaki Z 800 (ZR A) 2013–2017 · Honest Speed, Zero Drama

So which one do you buy?

The Z 750R has the edge if…

Daily commuting & city riding

Small edge: Z 750R

For the Monday-to-Friday grind, the Z 750R pulls a nose in front. Thank simpler maintenance for that. Your own commute could easily flip it.

The Z 800 has the edge if…

Traveling with luggage

Nose ahead: Z 800

For trips with luggage, the Z 800 nudges ahead. Not by much.

Sporty riding on twisty roads

Inches ahead: Z 800

Back-road fun leans slightly toward the Z 800. It's down to better suspension and more feel through the bars. It's a narrow call, so trust your test ride.

What makes each one tick

Z 750R

The Z 750R's inline-four answers clean off a closed throttle, and there's no surge or stumble to unsettle the chassis halfway through a bend. At corner entry, the front tucks in where you aim it. Long sessions don't soften the stock fork and shock. The four pulls without strain.

Nils rode the Z 750R in Slovakia in 2011, and in Hungary in 2012 (NastyNils Testride).

Z 800

The Z 800's bored-out four pulls eagerly from low revs, and there's no step in the power as the needle climbs. Broken pavement doesn't rattle it: the KYB fork and shock soak up the hits and keep the chassis settled. Wide bars set a neutral, slightly forward stance you'll hold for a full day. The four howls to its peak.

The Voice of Experience

Portrait of NastyNils

What actually separates them

  • The Z 750R has the lower wet weight: 494 lb (224 kg) vs 505 lb (229 kg).
  • The Z 800 makes more peak power: 113 hp (83 kW) vs 106 hp (78 kW).
  • The Z 800 makes more peak torque: 61 lb-ft (83 Nm) vs 58 lb-ft (78 Nm).

See every difference ↓

Which one for the way you ride

Comfortable long-distance riding

Both fall short

Long-haul comfort is a weak spot for both. If you tour, shop with that in mind.

A confidence-building first motorcycle

Not built for this

For a brand-new rider, both are the wrong place to start. Learn the basics on a smaller bike first.

Who each one is built for

SoCal Canyon Performance Rider

Appalachian Technical Corner Rider

Texas Hill Country Weekend Rider

What's good, and what you'll live with

Z 750R

From Nils' own saddle time

Strengths

  • Clean, unstrained power delivery
  • Metered torque through sweepers
  • Stock suspension goes the distance
  • Planted at highway speed
  • Brakes shrug off hard use

Trade-offs

  • Stock exhaust mutes the top end
  • Hard parts touch down early
  • Runs out of lean angle
  • Fueling wants finishing

Z 800

What owners say

Strengths

  • Surprisingly refined ride quality
  • Comfortable, all-day ergonomics

Trade-offs

  • Heavy weight dulls agility
  • Intrusive engine vibrations at highway speed
  • Lack of wind protection
  • No gear indicator and basic dash

What they share

Engine
Inline-four
Cooling
Liquid-cooled
Gearbox
6-speed
Final drive
Chain
Fork
Upside-down (USD)
Front tire
120/70-17
Rear tire
180/55-17

Where the spec sheets split

Seat height and weight
Z 750R Z 800
Seat height 32.5 in (825 mm) 32.8 in (834 mm)
Wet weight 494 lb (224 kg) 505 lb (229 kg)
Engine, power and torque
Z 750R Z 800
Displacement 748 cc 806 cc
Power 106 hp (78 kW) 113 hp (83 kW)
Peak power at 10,500 rpm 10,200 rpm
Torque 58 lb-ft (78 Nm) 61 lb-ft (83 Nm)
Peak torque at 8,300 rpm 8,000 rpm
Top speed 137 mph (220 km/h) 145 mph (233 km/h)
Fuel tank capacity
Z 750R Z 800
Fuel capacity 4.9 US gal (18.5 L) 4.5 US gal (17 L)
Other specifications
Z 750R Z 800
Front brake 300 mm 310 mm

Head to head, area by area

Both bikes on the same scale, one area at a time.

Braking

Engine

Handling

Suspension

Comfort

Reliability

Practicality

Sporting Capability

Usability

Specs and equipment as of October 21, 2026. The riding calls use the same ratings behind both buyer's guides.