By · ·

Motorcycle comparison · Naked Bike

CFMOTO 800NK (MY2023) vs Yamaha MT-07 (RM33)

CFMOTO 800NK vs Yamaha MT-07: no fairing, no excuses. Here's how to pick.

You'll notice the CFMOTO 800NK's eagerness first: tip it in and it's darting toward the apex like a supermoto. The Yamaha MT-07's wider bar levers it in without stretching.

CFMOTO 800NK (MY2023) and Yamaha MT-07 (RM33) side by side
CFMOTO 800NK (MY2023) 2023 · Sharp Tech, Budget Price Yamaha MT-07 (RM33) 2021–2024 · Built to Beg for More

So which one do you buy?

The 800NK has the edge if…

Daily commuting & city riding

A touch ahead: 800NK

On the way to work, the 800NK asks a little less of you. Close enough that the test ride should settle it.

Sporty riding on twisty roads

Nose ahead: 800NK

On a winding road, the 800NK comes out a touch ahead. It's down to a sportier chassis and more feel through the bars. You wouldn't bet much on a gap like that.

The MT-07 has the edge if…

Keeping running costs low

Small edge: MT-07

For the money you spend after the purchase, the MT-07 nudges ahead. The gap is too small to plan a budget around.

What makes each one tick

800NK

Low revs already have the 800NK's twin pulling hard, and it keeps swelling into a rousing rush up top. There's an abrupt snatch at small throttle openings in town. The brake lever works a 320 mm front brake to haul the bike down from speed. The front end's itching to turn.

MT-07

From low rpm the MT-07's twin pulls hard, then keeps climbing without a hiccup. Its clutch lever's light and feathers cleanly in stop-and-go traffic. Corner entry comes quick, and the chassis doesn't push wide once it's leaned over. Its right lever bites and modulates.

Nils rode the MT-07 in 2021, and in Austria in 2023 (NastyNils Testride).

The Voice of Experience

Portrait of NastyNils
Yamaha MT-07 (RM33)
Yamaha

What actually separates them

  • The 800NK makes more peak power: 99 hp (74 kW) vs 73 hp (54 kW).
  • The 800NK makes more peak torque: 60 lb-ft (81 Nm) vs 49 lb-ft (67 Nm).
  • The 800NK has the larger engine: 799 cc vs 689 cc.

See every difference ↓

Which one for the way you ride

Comfortable long-distance riding

Neither one fits

Neither of these is a mile-muncher. If big days are the plan, keep looking.

A confidence-building first motorcycle

Not built for it: 800NK

The 800NK isn't a first bike. Learn on something gentler and come back to it later.

Who each one is built for

Bay Area Ridge Road Social Rider

Appalachian Technical Corner Rider

SoCal Canyon Performance Rider

What's good, and what you'll live with

800NK

What owners say

Strengths

  • Excellent value for money
  • Punchy, characterful parallel-twin engine
  • Sharp, sporty handling
  • High-quality fit and finish
  • Awesome TFT display

Trade-offs

  • Overly stiff suspension for lighter riders
  • Snatchy low-speed throttle
  • Uncomfortable seat and cramped ergonomics
  • Wooden brakes lacking initial bite

MT-07

Strengths

  • Engine With Real Character
  • Begs You To Misbehave
  • Flickable In Tight Turns
  • Braking Is A Non-Issue

Trade-offs

  • No Traction Control At All
  • Fork Can't Be Adjusted
  • Seat Quits After An Hour
  • Rear Hops Under Engine Braking
  • Build quality and surface finish

Known problems to check before you buy

800NK

No confirmed faults on file yet. That's not the same as fault-free.

MT-07

  • Yamaha OEM accessory lower engine guard can impair rear brake pedal travel The Yamaha original accessory "lower engine protection" (crash bar/engine guard) can restrict rear brake pedal travel after installation, reducing braking effectiveness. Primarily affects motorcycles used in driving schools where the accessory is commonly fitted.
  • Non-adjustable front fork too soft; instability at pace The stock front fork is a non-adjustable damper-rod design. It is too soft for spirited riding, causing front-end dive under braking, instability at higher speeds, and lack of composure on rough surfaces. The most commonly reported complaint across professional reviews and owner forums. Aftermarket solutions (progressive springs, cartridge kits) are widely recommended.
  • Stock seat causes discomfort beyond 60–90 minutes The stock rider seat is too firm and flat for rides exceeding approximately one hour. The pillion seat is small and inadequate. This significantly limits touring usability. Aftermarket comfort seats, gel pads, or sheepskin covers are common remedies.
  • Front LED turn signals loosen from vibration The front indicator/turn signal lights can work loose from vibration or minor impacts. The rubber mounting piece can cave into the signal socket. Left side more commonly affected. Requires periodic retightening.
  • Noticeable vibration through handlebars and footpegs at sustained highway rpm The CP2 parallel twin produces vibrations that are transmitted through handlebars and footpegs, particularly at sustained cruising speeds around 6,000 rpm. Causes numbness in hands and feet on longer rides. Mirrors become blurry/unusable at higher speeds. Inherent engine characteristic of the parallel-twin layout. Bar-end weights and rubber-mounted mirrors are common aftermarket remedies.

What they share

Engine
Parallel twin
Cooling
Liquid-cooled
Gearbox
6-speed
Front tire
120/70-17
Rear tire
180/55-17

Where the spec sheets split

Seat height and weight
800NK MT-07
Seat height 31.3 in (795 mm) 31.7 in (805 mm)
Wet weight 410 lb (186 kg) 406 lb (184 kg)
Engine, power and torque
800NK MT-07
Displacement 799 cc 689 cc
Power 99 hp (74 kW) 73 hp (54 kW)
Torque 60 lb-ft (81 Nm) 49 lb-ft (67 Nm)
Fuel economy and tank capacity
800NK MT-07
Fuel economy 47 mpg (US) / 5 L/100 km 58 mpg (US) / 4.06 L/100 km
Fuel capacity 4.0 US gal (15 L) 3.7 US gal (14 L)
Other specifications
800NK MT-07
Fork Upside-down (USD) Telescopic
Front brake 320 mm 298 mm
Wheelbase 57.7 in (1465 mm) 55.1 in (1400 mm)

What comes fitted, what costs extra

800NK MT-07
Ride Modes Standard Not offered
Manually Adjustable Front Suspension Standard Not offered
Quickshifter Standard Not offered
Slipper Clutch Standard Not offered
TFT Display Standard Standard (from 2023)
Smartphone Connectivity Standard Standard (from 2023)

Head to head, area by area

Both bikes on the same scale, one area at a time.

Braking

Engine

Handling

Suspension

Comfort

Reliability

Practicality

Sporting Capability

Usability

Specs and equipment as of November 5, 2026. The riding calls use the same ratings behind both buyer's guides.