By ·

Motorcycle comparison · Naked Bike

Yamaha MT-09 (RN87-SP) vs Triumph Street Triple R (MY2023)

Yamaha MT-09 vs Triumph Street Triple R: which one's easier to live with every day.

Tip the Yamaha MT-09 into a bend and it's settled at once, holding you down inside the bike. The Triumph Street Triple R's frame talks to you through the turn and doesn't fight your hands. It turns in light and stays planted.

Yamaha MT-09 (RN87-SP) and Triumph Street Triple R (MY2023) side by side
Yamaha MT-09 (RN87-SP) 2024 · The Triple With Real Soul Triumph Street Triple R (MY2023) 2023 · Feedback First, Triple Soul

So which one do you buy?

The MT-09 has the edge if…

Daily commuting & city riding

Small edge: MT-09

Day in, day out, the MT-09 nudges ahead in traffic. That comes from lower running costs. It isn't a big enough gap to plan around.

Keeping running costs low

Slight edge: MT-09

The MT-09 comes out a little ahead on upkeep. Only a little.

What makes each one tick

MT-09

The MT-09's triple growls on an off-beat note that isn't exhaust trickery, yet hardly any buzz reaches the bars. It won't go wild.

Nils rode the MT-09 in Austria in 2025 (NastyNils Testride).

Street Triple R

On the Angeles Crest Highway, there's barely any effort needed at the bar to flick the Street Triple R from one switchback to the next. Brembo calipers bite hard off the brake lever, and the stop builds as evenly as you squeeze. The Showa fork soaks up ripples. Its lever keeps its feel when the pace climbs.

Nils rode the Street Triple R in 2023 (NastyNils Testride).

The Voice of Experience

Portrait of NastyNils

What actually separates them

  • The Street Triple R has the lower wet weight: 417 lb (189 kg) vs 428 lb (194 kg).
  • The MT-09 makes more peak torque: 69 lb-ft (93 Nm) vs 59 lb-ft (80 Nm).
  • The MT-09 has the larger engine: 890 cc vs 765 cc.

See every difference ↓

Which one for the way you ride

Comfortable long-distance riding

Both miss here

Neither of these is a mile-muncher. If big days are the plan, keep looking.

A confidence-building first motorcycle

Look elsewhere

Neither of these is a sensible first motorcycle. Learn on something smaller and lighter, then come back.

They come out level on twisty roads. The better-kept used example is the smarter money.

Who each one is built for

SoCal Canyon Performance Rider

Angeles Crest Highway · Coronado Trail · Highway 1

Appalachian Technical Corner Rider

Back of the Dragon · Blue Ridge Parkway · Cherohala Skyway

Bay Area Ridge Road Social Rider

Bay Area Ridge Roads · San Francisco · Skyline Boulevard

What's good, and what you'll live with

MT-09

Strengths

  • Standout Triple For Back Roads
  • Big Brakes, Light Lever
  • Quickshifter You Forget About
  • Settled From The First Corner
  • Upright Comfort For All Day

Trade-offs

  • Less Planted At High Speed
  • Down On Grunt To Fours
  • SP Suspension Rewards Hard Use
  • Seat comfort remains firm on long journeys

Street Triple R

What owners say

Strengths

  • Communicative and agile chassis
  • Excellent quickshifter and gearbox
  • Powerful brakes with good feel
  • Superb build quality and attention to detail

Trade-offs

  • Reduced fuel range due to smaller tank
  • Limited wind protection and storage options
  • Vague feel from stock Continental tyres

What they share

Engine
Inline-three
Cooling
Liquid-cooled
Gearbox
6-speed
Final drive
Chain
Fork
Upside-down (USD)
Front tire
120/70-17
Rear tire
180/55-17

Where the spec sheets split

Seat height and weight
MT-09 Street Triple R
Seat height 32.5 in (825 mm) 32.5 in (826 mm)
Wet weight 428 lb (194 kg) 417 lb (189 kg)
Engine, power and torque
MT-09 Street Triple R
Displacement 890 cc 765 cc
Power 119 hp (88 kW) 118 hp (88 kW)
Peak power at 10,000 rpm 11,500 rpm
Torque 69 lb-ft (93 Nm) 59 lb-ft (80 Nm)
Peak torque at 7,000 rpm 9,500 rpm
Fuel economy and tank capacity
MT-09 Street Triple R
Fuel economy 47 mpg (US) / 5 L/100 km 44 mpg (US) / 5.33 L/100 km
Fuel capacity 3.7 US gal (14 L) 4.0 US gal (15 L)
Other specifications
MT-09 Street Triple R
Front brake 298 mm 310 mm
Wheelbase 56.3 in (1430 mm) 55.3 in (1405 mm)

Head to head, area by area

Both bikes on the same scale, one area at a time.

Braking

Engine

Handling

Suspension

Comfort

Reliability

Practicality

Sporting Capability

Usability

Specs and equipment as of October 19, 2026. The riding calls use the same ratings behind both buyer's guides.