By ·

Motorcycle comparison · Naked Bike

Kawasaki Z 300 (MY2015) vs Z250SL (MY2015)

Kawasaki Z 300 vs Z250SL: no fairing, no excuses. Here's how to pick.

Tip the Kawasaki Z 300 into a bend and it doesn't argue: the chassis flicks it straight onto your line. The Kawasaki Z250SL's wide bars sit on a stiff trellis frame, and it's light enough to steer in with a thought. Its front tips in at the slightest nudge.

Kawasaki Z 300 (MY2015) and Kawasaki Z250SL (MY2015) side by side
Kawasaki Z 300 (MY2015) 2015–2017 · City Ace, Rev It Hard Kawasaki Z250SL (MY2015) 2015–2016 · Featherweight City Carver

So which one do you buy?

The Z 300 has the edge if…

Daily commuting & city riding

Narrow edge: Z 300

Through rush hour, the Z 300 is a little easier to live with. Only a little.

Sporty riding on twisty roads

A touch ahead: Z 300

In the twisties, the Z 300 asks a bit less of you to go quickly. Call it a modest edge.

A confidence-building first motorcycle

Slight edge: Z 300

Fresh off the training course, the Z 300 feels a bit more forgiving. Credit easier controls. Only by a small margin, though.

What makes each one tick

Z 300

With its torque peaking at 10,000 rpm, the Z 300's twin keeps the gear lever clicking. Down low, the throttle gets little back from the motor. Up top, the twin's finally pulling hard.

Z250SL

From low revs to the limiter, the Z250SL's single spins eagerly, and its balancer shaft doesn't let much buzz reach the grips. A squeeze of the brake lever brings strong stopping power, with plenty of feel coming back through it. Trail-braking into a turn doesn't unsettle the bike. Firm suspension keeps that tire dug in.

The Voice of Experience

Portrait of NastyNils

What actually separates them

  • The Z250SL has the lower wet weight: 324 lb (147 kg) vs 375 lb (170 kg).
  • The Z 300 makes more peak power: 39 hp (29 kW) vs 28 hp (21 kW).
  • The Z 300 makes more peak torque: 20 lb-ft (27 Nm) vs 17 lb-ft (23 Nm).

See every difference ↓

Which one for the way you ride

Comfortable long-distance riding

Neither is a natural fit

Hours in the saddle won't flatter either of these. They're happier on shorter runs.

Traveling with luggage

Both fall short

For a week on the road with gear, both fall short. A proper tourer will carry it with far less fuss.

Who each one is built for

Bay Area Ridge Road Social Rider

Appalachian Technical Corner Rider

SoCal Canyon Performance Rider

What's good, and what you'll live with

Z 300

What owners say

Strengths

  • Agile and fun handling in the urban jungle
  • Legendary reliability on a proven platform

Trade-offs

  • Peaky power delivery demands high revs

Z250SL

What owners say

Strengths

  • Smooth, rev‑happy engine
  • Superlight and agile handling
  • Excellent build quality and reliability
  • Powerful, communicative brakes

What they share

Seat height
30.9 in (785 mm)
Cooling
Liquid-cooled
Gearbox
6-speed
Final drive
Chain
Fork
Telescopic

Where the spec sheets split

Seat height and weight
Z 300 Z250SL
Wet weight 375 lb (170 kg) 324 lb (147 kg)
Engine, power and torque
Z 300 Z250SL
Displacement 296 cc 249 cc
Engine Parallel twin Single-cylinder
Power 39 hp (29 kW) 28 hp (21 kW)
Peak power at 11,000 rpm 9,700 rpm
Torque 20 lb-ft (27 Nm) 17 lb-ft (23 Nm)
Peak torque at 10,000 rpm 8,200 rpm
Fuel tank capacity
Z 300 Z250SL
Fuel capacity 4.5 US gal (17 L) 2.9 US gal (11 L)
Other specifications
Z 300 Z250SL
Front tire 110/70-17 100/80-17
Rear tire 140/70-17 130/70-17

What comes fitted, what costs extra

Z 300 Z250SL
ABS Standard (from 2016) Option

Head to head, area by area

Both bikes on the same scale, one area at a time.

Braking

Engine

Handling

Suspension

Comfort

Reliability

Practicality

Sporting Capability

Usability

Specs and equipment as of October 17, 2026. The riding calls use the same ratings behind both buyer's guides.